Last year at the National Museum
of American History I was surprised that the museum decided to call the military
action at the turn of the twentieth-century “War of Expansion.” I was not
surprised because I felt differently, I was surprised that the nationally
excepted (which I think we can safely assume because the museum is a NATIONAL
museum) story about the turn of the century wars…you know…accurate. Now they
did not make a judgment call, they did not say “this was misguided…we
probably should not of done this…” but of course if they said that it
might bring up issues about our current wars which is another (very very
similar) bag of issues.
So flash forward (backwards?) to this afternoon. I expected to see a lot of pomp and celebratory
exhibits about how great the Marines are,have been and forever will be. A place
that really supported and protected the idea of the brand of masculinity that comes with
marine identity and character. BUT I was surprised, for at least half of the
exhibits.
The ones that focused on (as the Smithsonian called it) the “Wars of Expansion,”
tell a story about how American economic, market, and political
interests lead to the Spanish-American War, the Philippines, South
America and the like. WHAT! That does not sound so heroic? That sounds like an aggressively
violent global policy. The exhibits were, as an undergrad described “a lot of reading,”
but if that does not scare you away you would read paragraph length explanations
of the events you would find carefully written descriptions of the wars. They
explained that the wars were caused by American “envy” over European Empires,
or escalated because of “greed” or “pride.” Now, it would be false to say all
these terms are used in the same sentence, sign or exhibit, but they are used
to describe the reasoning for the use of Marine military force and speak loudly
about how we have come to understand these wars…and perhaps give us an idea of
what 100 years could do to our understanding of the wars we are in now. Additionally,
if you are not into reading..or you know have a “friend” who does not like to
read, the paragraphs are surprisingly easy to ignore because there is a lot of
gun type-collections, hats, and different kinds of uniforms to distract you.
Like Gas Masks? They got your gas
masks right here…
|
The WWII and more recent war exhibits
were more in-line with what I expected; celebratory. But no vet wants to go to
a museum and made to feel bad about their service. These exhibits had more
personal stories and more artifacts (guns, packs, MREs, ect), they were less
intended to educate the public about the issues and more there to aid in
grandpa’s stories. (ex: “See Tommy Papa used a gun just like that to shoot the
bad guys.” “Oh look at this Sally, I had a pack just like that.” “Lil Jimmy
look at this photo—I use to handsome
like this guy.” “Marie, come look at the tank Grandpapa drove in Nam.” You get
the idea). They also help promote recruitment, these exhibits tell stories
about how the Marines helped people, were brave, good, and just. It should be
noted that I am not being negative, these are all necessary elements of recruitment
and commemoration- however I want to point out the different ways in which the
wars were explained and approached.
Marines at Harper's Ferry...you know John Brown... |
So on to the dioramas--- I don’t see
a lot of dioramas used in museums anymore, but wowie were these dioramas
great. Life-like wax people running, sweating, making faces, and little tiny
scenes of naval battles, forced perception, painted landscape –really nice
stuff. If you like dioramas this is the place to be. If overly patriotic
versions of military history make you want to pluck your eyes out with the 18th
century bayonet, then you’ll be fine here, no worries and if you feel so inclined there ARE bayonets for eye removal... If you want to see a lot
of 20th century War paraphernalia, tanks, plains, ect, you will be
happy here. If you like seeing Grandparents, again this is the place to go (old
men with pin hats..oh ya they are all over the place).
"Ooo finally something for the ladies.." |
No comments:
Post a Comment